Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +713%
3.58 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
R600
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy