Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +483%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Cayman
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy