Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +473%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy