Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +11%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy