Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +258%
3.58 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy