Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +77%
3.58 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1440
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Cypress
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy