Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +7855%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy