Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +762%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy