AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2331MHz vs 1770MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 290W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 's Advantages

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +507%

21.75 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +775%

70

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +525%

125

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti +408%

178

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

May 2021

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

1575 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1188 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

64bit

Memory Bus

256bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

608.3GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

48

12

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

6144

48

TMUs

192

32

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

192

12

RT Cores

48

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

169.9 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

339.8 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.75 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

21.75 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

339.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

GA104

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

GA104-400-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

6 nm

Process Size

8 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

17.4 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

392 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

290W

250 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

2

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

4

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T1000

5

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

6

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

7

AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T600

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower