AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2331MHz vs 1665MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 350W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 's Advantages

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (912.4GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

9472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +852%

34.1 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +1050%

92

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +665%

153

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +468%

199

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

May 2021

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

1365 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1188 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

64bit

Memory Bus

384bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

912.4GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

80

12

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

10240

48

TMUs

320

32

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

320

12

RT Cores

80

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

6 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

186.5 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

532.8 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

34.10 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

34.10 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

532.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

GA102

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

GA102-225-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

6 nm

Process Size

8 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

28.3 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

628 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

350W

250 W

Suggested PSU

750 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

3

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

4

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

5

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

6

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCI

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance