Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2331MHz vs 1770MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +51%
5.437 TFLOPS
Blender
Radeon Pro W6400
221
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +269%
817
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
Radeon Pro W6400
8
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +250%
28
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
Radeon Pro W6400
20
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +160%
52
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
Radeon Pro W6400
35
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +128%
80
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2019
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy