Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +2030%
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV630
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy