CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8860 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
+51%
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8860 OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
VS
Radeon HD 8860 OEM
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
Curacao
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
2
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
4
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
5
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
7
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400
8
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
9
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon X1550 AGP
10
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy