Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2331MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +344%
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy