Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 390

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 390

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390 +43%
5.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2015
Radeon Pro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.120 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Grenada
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy