Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV560
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy