Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon Pro W6500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6500M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2040MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6500M +69%
4.178 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
130.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
8.356 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
4.178 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
261.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
TU117
Navi 24
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy