Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +82%
9.247 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
235W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy