Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +1678%
9.247 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
400
112
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy