Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +1104%
9.247 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
480
112
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy