Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +1625%
9.247 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1792
Shading Units
216
112
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy