Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +1386%
9.247 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
236W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy