Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (2034MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600M +814%
7.29 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1224 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
2034 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
66
SM Count
3
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
264
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

130.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
227.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
14.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
7.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
455.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
10W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
GP108B
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy