Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3440 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +2774%
17.82 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
400
240
TMUs
20
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy