Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +1385%
17.82 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
151W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy