Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +346%
17.82 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy