Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +3485%
17.82 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
320
240
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy