Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +39500%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3840
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy