Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +11323%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
3840
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
29W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy