Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +267%
17.82 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
160
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy