Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +117%
17.82 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy