Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
3744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +6137%
16.03 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
3840
Shading Units
96
240
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
69W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT215
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy