Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +2164%
16.03 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3840
Shading Units
240
240
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy