Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +2135%
16.03 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
512
240
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy