Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +184%
16.03 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
2816
240
TMUs
176
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
580W
550 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy