Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +52328%
22.02 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
40
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV610
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy