Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy