Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy