Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +1900%
22.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
640
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
80W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy