Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (265W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +567%
22.02 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2016
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
1792
320
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
265W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy