Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +2767%
22.02 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy