Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +1735%
22.02 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
800
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
160W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy