Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +23577%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
5120
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G84
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy