Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 384MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +8240%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
5120
Shading Units
96
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
12
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
105W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G92
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
G92-150-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy