Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
5008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +5966%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jul 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
112
320
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
120W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G92B
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy