Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +5589%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
128
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G92B
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy