Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +4516%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
5120
Shading Units
192
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
28
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy