Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Apr 2004
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
12
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
NV41
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy