Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +28923%
12.19 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
RV610
Navi 33
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy