Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +2670%
12.19 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
R600
Navi 33
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy